Kickstarter - Dragonrose Historical Patterns

-
This is finally happening!

Julie (or should I link here?) and I have been tossing around these plans for starting a line of historical patterns for a long time. I'm not quite sure how long. I've been merrily taking pattern after pattern for a couple of years so that once the infrastructure is in place, we can start putting them into the computer program and working on the grading, making test samples, etc. But first we need the computer program and associated modules, hence the Kickstarter.

Our first pattern, which we're making available for pre-order as the basis for the Kickstarter, is for the 1867 pink evening gown by Emile Pingat in the collection of the Albany Institute of History and Art.

Evening dress, Pingat, ca. 1867; AIHA 1972.95.2
Julie actually made the first version of the pattern and took it to the Costume Society of America conference in Cleveland this year, where it won the CSA Designer Showcase. (I'm going to be making my own soon as well.)


Dragonrose Historical Patterns will produce patterns that are custom-sized to your measurements, rather than only standard sizes made to fit idealized bodies. (It's the program module for this function that the Kickstarter is funding.) This will be a huge time-, energy-, and frustration-saver for those sewing at home.

So far, we are only working on this specific pattern. However! I will cautiously make no promises about which specific patterns will come later, but I can tell you that I have in my binder:
  • an early 1910s shirtwaist
  • a simple white linen dress of the same period
  • the gown I wore to Julie's Hallowedding (ca. 1872)
  • a slightly later bustle gown with a cuirass bodice, ca. 1875
  • an envelope chemise from the 1910s or 1920s
  • an unboned Double Vee corset waist, 1890s
  • a mid-1840s fan-front silk dress
  • and that's not including the many interesting garments I know of in various museums but haven't had the time to pattern yet!
I am really looking forward to creating patterns that are as authentic as possible - based on specific historical garments, or maybe two combined for variety in such a way that which parts belong to which are clearly marked - and, just as importantly, are tested and double-checked so that you don't end up with instructions that can't be parsed or seam allowances that don't match up.

So if you're interested in this venture, please consider supporting Dragonrose Patterns! And please let us know your thoughts on this particular pattern, the line as a whole, or what you'd like to see in the future.

Comments

  1. AnnaAugust 16, 2016 at 3:37 PM

    How exciting! Looking forward to seeing this develop.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyAugust 17, 2016 at 9:15 PM

      Thank you! I think we're going to go places.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pride and Prejudice 1995: The Little Things

-
Image
I did threaten to write about the Ehle/Firth Pride and Prejudice , and since I'm in a writing mood without a topic I decided to make good. Regency adaptations tend to go for an overall accurate look, interpreting age and income within the confines of realistic silhouettes and colors, and so they avoid the scrutiny and reputation that a more obviously artistic and unrealistic production garners. But just as this version of P&P  is not entirely faithful in every respect (e.g. the added Darcy-perspective scenes, the actors nearly all being significantly older than their characters - perhaps the most egregious example being Julia Sawalha in her late twenties playing teenage Lydia), Dinah Hill's costuming is not entirely accurate - mainly in ways that make the period more appealing to modern tastes. The exact date when the story is set is never given; generally, the movie's taken to be set in 1813, when the book was published. I'm not going to go into the full story of...
Read more

A Difficult History: Corsetry and Feminism, Part One

-
Image
Recently, I began following a couple of Tumblr blogs focusing on waist training and daily corset wear. Daily wear is not for me, waist training even less so, but I find it an interesting practice. It is also a controversial one. For example, a recent Huffington Post article, " Corset Queen Penny Brown Loves Getting 'Waisted' ," drew comments which were nearly all extremely negative, as do most articles that bring the practice to mainstream attention. Usually, the mental states of the women who waist-train are called into question, and there are numerous references to feminism as incompatible with corsets. The general idea is that the first wave feminists of the late 19th and early 20th century would be horrified by women today wearing them, and that their assumed reaction is an objective statement on the practice. My feeling is that the subject is complex, and cannot be simply declared feminist or unfeminist. There are far more factors than the average internet comm...
Read more

Pattern Time: 1860s Chemise

-
Image
For my 150th post ( \o/ ), a quick little pattern someone might find useful. When I was working my way through a box a few weeks ago, I came across a chemise that didn't quite want to lay flat.  I took a closer look at it to figure out why, and noticed that it had a unique construction with the sleeves cut in one with the body and gussets inserted in the neckline.  I did a really quick sketch of the cutting layout and measured the important bits, so that when I got home I could draw it up in proportion on graph paper. (nb. I messed up. I've been noticing it for a while, but didn't want to point it out from shame, but I accidentally gave the neckline length as it is when gathered - the horizontal cut should be much longer, to within about four inches of the side seam. Please correct for this when making your own version.)
Read more