Galerie des Modes, 29e Cahier, 1ere Figure

-
Woman dressed in a plain Lévite edged with a band of pleated Gauze; the Belt in the latest fashion, of spotted ribbon, with knots and fringe at the end; she is coiffed with a turban or toque à la Levantine pulled up with Pearls and surmounted with plumes in panaches on a half-négligée and very relaxed hairstyle. (1780)

LÉVITE A LA DÉVOTE, the bodice closed very high, with a bow matching the belt, from which the collar escapes, almost entirely covering the chest.  Volant uniform with the petticoat; belt tied in a bow, trimmed with a headed fringe called à la Juive.  Parement of the sleeve en bottes.  Hairstyle low and loose, underneath a Levantine toque, shaded by a panache with four branches, accompanied by an aigrette of heron feathers.

The Man who holds the lorgnette is dressed in an Overcoat trimmed with wood buttons worked in marquetry, very light and very unique.  Round wig à la Jokeis; hat, buttoned in the back; cow-nose shoes, following the ancient fashion, favorable for gouty feet.

The other figure, pressing his lips to a hand which is slipping him a billet-doux, is dressed in a deshabillé or overcoat edged de systéme, in a double row on the pockets.  Vest and breeches matching the Suit; hair à l'espoir with a finger curl.



Comments

  1. ZipZipFebruary 22, 2013 at 10:59 AM

    Dear Cassidy,
    Ah, these May-December marriages rarely turn out well, planned or not. Little sly boots has picked an unappealing young man, or perhaps it's just the artists' perspective that's at fault.

    Anyhow, this Levite ensemble has to be one of my favorites of all those in the current volume. It's relative simple, the colors are attractive, and the hair isn't outlandish. Methinks the Mr. does not approve of mile-high 'dos?

    The dress is rather makeable, actually; wonder why no costumers make Levites?

    Very best,

    Natalie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyFebruary 22, 2013 at 1:01 PM

      I've noticed that some of the "handsome" men in these have baby heads - not very appealing, no!

      I've been wondering why a lot of these (the familiar ones, anyway, from the MFA) don't seem to have inspired much interest among costumers/reenactors/recreationists. My guess is that the plain ones (levites, turques) are just too plain to appeal, and the fancy ones (circassiennes) look like too much work ... but then, a lot of people like doing fairly plain gowns, don't they? So my next guess is that people don't like the long sleeves, because so many events take place in the summer, and because longer sleeves take longer to fit and make up.

      I think an event based around neglected types of gowns and trimming styles would be a fun response!

      Delete
  2. Vincent BriggsFebruary 23, 2013 at 6:13 PM

    Lovely, I would gladly wear any of those 3 outfits. I think the one on the left is my favorite, I do love red coats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyFebruary 23, 2013 at 7:59 PM

      I think I prefer the grey suit - all that gold braid!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pride and Prejudice 1995: The Little Things

-
Image
I did threaten to write about the Ehle/Firth Pride and Prejudice , and since I'm in a writing mood without a topic I decided to make good. Regency adaptations tend to go for an overall accurate look, interpreting age and income within the confines of realistic silhouettes and colors, and so they avoid the scrutiny and reputation that a more obviously artistic and unrealistic production garners. But just as this version of P&P  is not entirely faithful in every respect (e.g. the added Darcy-perspective scenes, the actors nearly all being significantly older than their characters - perhaps the most egregious example being Julia Sawalha in her late twenties playing teenage Lydia), Dinah Hill's costuming is not entirely accurate - mainly in ways that make the period more appealing to modern tastes. The exact date when the story is set is never given; generally, the movie's taken to be set in 1813, when the book was published. I'm not going to go into the full story of
Read more

Pattern Time: 1860s Chemise

-
Image
For my 150th post ( \o/ ), a quick little pattern someone might find useful. When I was working my way through a box a few weeks ago, I came across a chemise that didn't quite want to lay flat.  I took a closer look at it to figure out why, and noticed that it had a unique construction with the sleeves cut in one with the body and gussets inserted in the neckline.  I did a really quick sketch of the cutting layout and measured the important bits, so that when I got home I could draw it up in proportion on graph paper. (nb. I messed up. I've been noticing it for a while, but didn't want to point it out from shame, but I accidentally gave the neckline length as it is when gathered - the horizontal cut should be much longer, to within about four inches of the side seam. Please correct for this when making your own version.)
Read more

A Difficult History: Corsetry and Feminism, Part One

-
Image
Recently, I began following a couple of Tumblr blogs focusing on waist training and daily corset wear. Daily wear is not for me, waist training even less so, but I find it an interesting practice. It is also a controversial one. For example, a recent Huffington Post article, " Corset Queen Penny Brown Loves Getting 'Waisted' ," drew comments which were nearly all extremely negative, as do most articles that bring the practice to mainstream attention. Usually, the mental states of the women who waist-train are called into question, and there are numerous references to feminism as incompatible with corsets. The general idea is that the first wave feminists of the late 19th and early 20th century would be horrified by women today wearing them, and that their assumed reaction is an objective statement on the practice. My feeling is that the subject is complex, and cannot be simply declared feminist or unfeminist. There are far more factors than the average internet comm
Read more