Galerie des Modes, 9e Cahier, 2e Figure

-
Elegant lady in informal gown of striped Indian Taffeta, trimmed with poufs in the same fabric. (1778)

Informal gown of striped Indian taffeta, trimmed in poufs of striped gauze; sleeves en pagode, with bonshommes; very high volante, headed with a trim similar to that of the gown, and with another band of it placed en barriere above the volante.

Black taffeta mantelet, with the ends of the hood coming to be lost under the contentement; these are called mantelets à coulisses; they are now the only kind in fashion, except among the devout ladies and certain ladies who are obliged by their age or other reasons to cover their chests.

Hair done in four curls, the fourth falling on the shoulder, accompanied by its confident; cap with lappets pulled up in the back, and gathered on their ends; ribbon en barriere, coming out of the middle of the papillon.

High-heeled shoes with square buckles, following the fashion of the day.

This Elegant Lady has removed one of her gloves and positioned one hand on her chest.  She swears to her love on that which is most dear to her to be always tender, always faithful: will she keep her promise?  Oh, what does it matter!  The rose lasts only a morning; it would perhaps be unjust to demand that her oath have the same duration.


Comments

  1. AuntieNanOctober 5, 2012 at 10:46 AM

    Thank you so much for posting these plates! Would that I had a costuming assignment in this period to use some of this grandeur! At some point, I would love to see some plates and commentary on what the men of the period were wearing...
    Thanks!
    Nancy N

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyOctober 5, 2012 at 12:02 PM

      There are a few gentlemen coming up! Not for a few cahiers, but they're coming, I promise.

      Glad you're enjoying this!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pride and Prejudice 1995: The Little Things

-
Image
I did threaten to write about the Ehle/Firth Pride and Prejudice , and since I'm in a writing mood without a topic I decided to make good. Regency adaptations tend to go for an overall accurate look, interpreting age and income within the confines of realistic silhouettes and colors, and so they avoid the scrutiny and reputation that a more obviously artistic and unrealistic production garners. But just as this version of P&P  is not entirely faithful in every respect (e.g. the added Darcy-perspective scenes, the actors nearly all being significantly older than their characters - perhaps the most egregious example being Julia Sawalha in her late twenties playing teenage Lydia), Dinah Hill's costuming is not entirely accurate - mainly in ways that make the period more appealing to modern tastes. The exact date when the story is set is never given; generally, the movie's taken to be set in 1813, when the book was published. I'm not going to go into the full story of...
Read more

A Difficult History: Corsetry and Feminism, Part One

-
Image
Recently, I began following a couple of Tumblr blogs focusing on waist training and daily corset wear. Daily wear is not for me, waist training even less so, but I find it an interesting practice. It is also a controversial one. For example, a recent Huffington Post article, " Corset Queen Penny Brown Loves Getting 'Waisted' ," drew comments which were nearly all extremely negative, as do most articles that bring the practice to mainstream attention. Usually, the mental states of the women who waist-train are called into question, and there are numerous references to feminism as incompatible with corsets. The general idea is that the first wave feminists of the late 19th and early 20th century would be horrified by women today wearing them, and that their assumed reaction is an objective statement on the practice. My feeling is that the subject is complex, and cannot be simply declared feminist or unfeminist. There are far more factors than the average internet comm...
Read more

Pattern Time: 1860s Chemise

-
Image
For my 150th post ( \o/ ), a quick little pattern someone might find useful. When I was working my way through a box a few weeks ago, I came across a chemise that didn't quite want to lay flat.  I took a closer look at it to figure out why, and noticed that it had a unique construction with the sleeves cut in one with the body and gussets inserted in the neckline.  I did a really quick sketch of the cutting layout and measured the important bits, so that when I got home I could draw it up in proportion on graph paper. (nb. I messed up. I've been noticing it for a while, but didn't want to point it out from shame, but I accidentally gave the neckline length as it is when gathered - the horizontal cut should be much longer, to within about four inches of the side seam. Please correct for this when making your own version.)
Read more