Petticoat and Corset

-
Those promised pictures!  I would have taken a picture of the petticoat on me but it's dreadfully unflattering without stays, and I didn't feel like taking the time to really get dressed.

The pleats from the inside.  I whipped them down to the twill tape with waxed linen thread.  Yes, the fabric has a strangely open weave - the things that happen when you order fabric online.

This picture keeps uploading sideways.  Why?  I don't know.  But this is the pleating from the outside.




Today I worked on my thesis corset.  Really, I didn't get a huge amount done, but I did make steps forward!  For one thing, I'd bought a new fabric marker at Walmart a few days ago, so I was able to draw over the thread-tracing and get rid of the basting stitches, and I was able to draw the lines easily for the last two channels.

This ... this looks pretty bad, I have to admit.  They're laced together at the back and at the straps, so they don't lie quite flat.  I sewed channels on each side of each seam, but I only put reed in one of each pair.  (I haven't cut out the cups yet, but I'm finally confident that they're the right size.)  The originals I'm working from were more heavily boned, and had some horizontal ones as well, but at this point I'm really just looking for something that will give me the right silhouette.

A little closer on the front panel.  You can kind of see the blue outlines here, and how sadly wrinkled everything is.  The next step would be to trim everything down and bind them (I can do the quilting later, and I'm not sure how much I'm going to do) BUT.  When I put these on and hold them at the front, they seem a bit loose at the bottom of the back. :/  I'm going to try cutting out the cups (instead of just putting a slit in, as you can see) and lacing the front as well, and then we'll see ... but if they don't still fit properly, I'll take out one of those side seams and take it in a little over an empty channel.  I don't want to, but if I have to ...

Comments

  1. lahbluebonnetAugust 10, 2011 at 10:14 PM

    The picture might load that way because you held the camera that way when shooting the picture. At least it does that for me. Then in my photo editor program I use the rotate arrows to rotate the photo into proper position. Then I upload the photo onto the blog. Hope that helps!

    ReplyDelete
  2. CassidyAugust 11, 2011 at 8:46 AM

    You know, I thought that was the issue (even though I didn't remember taking the picture that way), but when I open the picture file it displays the right way round! I think it's just Blogger being Blogger.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousFebruary 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM

    Hi there where did you buy that open weave fabric from? Kide regards, Alex

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyFebruary 18, 2013 at 4:50 PM

      Hi, Alex! I got it from Fashion Fabrics Club online. I have no idea if they're still carrying it.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pride and Prejudice 1995: The Little Things

-
Image
I did threaten to write about the Ehle/Firth Pride and Prejudice , and since I'm in a writing mood without a topic I decided to make good. Regency adaptations tend to go for an overall accurate look, interpreting age and income within the confines of realistic silhouettes and colors, and so they avoid the scrutiny and reputation that a more obviously artistic and unrealistic production garners. But just as this version of P&P  is not entirely faithful in every respect (e.g. the added Darcy-perspective scenes, the actors nearly all being significantly older than their characters - perhaps the most egregious example being Julia Sawalha in her late twenties playing teenage Lydia), Dinah Hill's costuming is not entirely accurate - mainly in ways that make the period more appealing to modern tastes. The exact date when the story is set is never given; generally, the movie's taken to be set in 1813, when the book was published. I'm not going to go into the full story of...
Read more

A Difficult History: Corsetry and Feminism, Part One

-
Image
Recently, I began following a couple of Tumblr blogs focusing on waist training and daily corset wear. Daily wear is not for me, waist training even less so, but I find it an interesting practice. It is also a controversial one. For example, a recent Huffington Post article, " Corset Queen Penny Brown Loves Getting 'Waisted' ," drew comments which were nearly all extremely negative, as do most articles that bring the practice to mainstream attention. Usually, the mental states of the women who waist-train are called into question, and there are numerous references to feminism as incompatible with corsets. The general idea is that the first wave feminists of the late 19th and early 20th century would be horrified by women today wearing them, and that their assumed reaction is an objective statement on the practice. My feeling is that the subject is complex, and cannot be simply declared feminist or unfeminist. There are far more factors than the average internet comm...
Read more

Pattern Time: 1860s Chemise

-
Image
For my 150th post ( \o/ ), a quick little pattern someone might find useful. When I was working my way through a box a few weeks ago, I came across a chemise that didn't quite want to lay flat.  I took a closer look at it to figure out why, and noticed that it had a unique construction with the sleeves cut in one with the body and gussets inserted in the neckline.  I did a really quick sketch of the cutting layout and measured the important bits, so that when I got home I could draw it up in proportion on graph paper. (nb. I messed up. I've been noticing it for a while, but didn't want to point it out from shame, but I accidentally gave the neckline length as it is when gathered - the horizontal cut should be much longer, to within about four inches of the side seam. Please correct for this when making your own version.)
Read more