More Sources for My Thesis

-
Mostly paintings, but I also want to bookmark this.




Self Portrait, Angelica Kauffman, ca. 1780

Self Portrait in a Straw Hat, Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun, after 1782

Lady Elizabeth Foster, Angelica Kauffman, 1784

Lady Elizabeth Foster, Sir Joshua Reynolds, 1787

Princess Louise Auguste, Jens Juel, 1787

Lady Lemon, by George Romney, 1787?

M Lavoisier and his Wife, David, 1788

Miss Martha Carry, Sir Thomas Lawrence, 1789

Comtesse de Sourcy, David, 1790

Mme Pastoret and her Son, David, 1791

Portrait of Grand Duchess Elena Pavlovna as a Child, Dmitry Levitzky, 1791

Marguerite Gérard, François Dumont, 1793

Belle-soeur de Madame Vigée Le Brun, Adèle de Romance Romany, early 1790s?

Portrait of a Lady, John Wesbrooke Chandler, early 1790s?

Madame Nicaise Perrin, Jean Charles Nicaise Perrin, early 1790s?

Mrs. James Arden, Gilbert Stuart, c.1794

Catherine-Marie-Jeanne Tallard, David, 1795

Madame Boyer-Fonfrède et de son fils, François André Vincent, 1796

Les Princesses Ielena et Alexandra Kourakine, Vladimir Lukitch Borovikovskii, ca. 1798

Madame Raymond de Verninac, David, 1799

Portrait of a Noblewoman with her Son, Jens Juel, 1799

Mme Recamier, David, ca. 1800

Miss Sweeting, Sir Thomas Lawrence, ca. 1800

Portrait of a Woman and Child, French Painter, 179?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pride and Prejudice 1995: The Little Things

-
Image
I did threaten to write about the Ehle/Firth Pride and Prejudice , and since I'm in a writing mood without a topic I decided to make good. Regency adaptations tend to go for an overall accurate look, interpreting age and income within the confines of realistic silhouettes and colors, and so they avoid the scrutiny and reputation that a more obviously artistic and unrealistic production garners. But just as this version of P&P  is not entirely faithful in every respect (e.g. the added Darcy-perspective scenes, the actors nearly all being significantly older than their characters - perhaps the most egregious example being Julia Sawalha in her late twenties playing teenage Lydia), Dinah Hill's costuming is not entirely accurate - mainly in ways that make the period more appealing to modern tastes. The exact date when the story is set is never given; generally, the movie's taken to be set in 1813, when the book was published. I'm not going to go into the full story of...
Read more

A Difficult History: Corsetry and Feminism, Part One

-
Image
Recently, I began following a couple of Tumblr blogs focusing on waist training and daily corset wear. Daily wear is not for me, waist training even less so, but I find it an interesting practice. It is also a controversial one. For example, a recent Huffington Post article, " Corset Queen Penny Brown Loves Getting 'Waisted' ," drew comments which were nearly all extremely negative, as do most articles that bring the practice to mainstream attention. Usually, the mental states of the women who waist-train are called into question, and there are numerous references to feminism as incompatible with corsets. The general idea is that the first wave feminists of the late 19th and early 20th century would be horrified by women today wearing them, and that their assumed reaction is an objective statement on the practice. My feeling is that the subject is complex, and cannot be simply declared feminist or unfeminist. There are far more factors than the average internet comm...
Read more

Pattern Time: 1860s Chemise

-
Image
For my 150th post ( \o/ ), a quick little pattern someone might find useful. When I was working my way through a box a few weeks ago, I came across a chemise that didn't quite want to lay flat.  I took a closer look at it to figure out why, and noticed that it had a unique construction with the sleeves cut in one with the body and gussets inserted in the neckline.  I did a really quick sketch of the cutting layout and measured the important bits, so that when I got home I could draw it up in proportion on graph paper. (nb. I messed up. I've been noticing it for a while, but didn't want to point it out from shame, but I accidentally gave the neckline length as it is when gathered - the horizontal cut should be much longer, to within about four inches of the side seam. Please correct for this when making your own version.)
Read more