Thank You and Some Progress

-
Thank you to everyone for commenting on my post about hoop skirts!  There are so very many statements out there, both from the period in a satirical or curmudgeonly vein and from secondary sources that don't take the biases of their primary sources into account.  And unlike other pervasive myths I've looked into or seen other people look into, there aren't many period sources that can be used to discredit it.  You can find a little black dress from before Chanel or an article on the benefits of a brown complexion from 1901 or descriptions of Andalusian fan language in a travelogue, but people did not tend to publish what the actual experience of wearing a hoop skirt was like.  I can research the actual proportions of fashionable and ordinary skirts from period images, but they don't tell me how quickly people tend to get used to the size, how often they generally knock things off tables, if it really is hideously difficult to go through a doorway or down a staircase, etc., giving me a starting point for study and probably more in-depth conversations through email.


This weekend, I've been working on getting together a wearable mockup of a Regency corset - machine-sewn for speed, I'll take a pattern of it when I'm sure they fit properly and make another set by hand - and now I'm getting out the scrap sheet to make a quick mockup (for a wearable mockup) of the 1840s corset in Waugh, or for this corset at Winterthur (leaning towards the latter as doing the gussets in he Regency mockup was pretty painful).  Let's get both of the corsets out of the way!  I want to start making outerwear, especially as I've had some fabric set by for a ca. 1840 dress for a long time.


My most recent Etsy item is also my favorite.  The frill/tucker can fill in a lower neckline or just hold the ruffled collar for a higher one.

Comments

  1. AuntieNanApril 8, 2013 at 7:40 AM

    Thanks for this! I am struggling with making a late Tudor(ish) corset--not my first, but lots of unknowns to grapple with, primarily my actor living 30 minutes away. This is also my first stab at a corset that doesn't somehow reshape the waist, and must be correctly structured to hold up a farthingale and skirts, and possibly have bodice elements attached? Making it up as I go, depending on the last variable, which is HOWMUCH stash do I have?? I am doing this on the machine, largely because the actor and audience couldn't give a tinkers fart about proper period construction! Keep us posted on how this goes!
    All the best,
    Nancy N

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyApril 9, 2013 at 11:16 AM

      Corsets and stays ARE such a struggle! At least the pieces tend to be simple enough that using a machine isn't more trouble than it's worth - I tried some 18th century gown sewing on the machine a while ago and wanted to throw it out the window.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pride and Prejudice 1995: The Little Things

-
Image
I did threaten to write about the Ehle/Firth Pride and Prejudice , and since I'm in a writing mood without a topic I decided to make good. Regency adaptations tend to go for an overall accurate look, interpreting age and income within the confines of realistic silhouettes and colors, and so they avoid the scrutiny and reputation that a more obviously artistic and unrealistic production garners. But just as this version of P&P  is not entirely faithful in every respect (e.g. the added Darcy-perspective scenes, the actors nearly all being significantly older than their characters - perhaps the most egregious example being Julia Sawalha in her late twenties playing teenage Lydia), Dinah Hill's costuming is not entirely accurate - mainly in ways that make the period more appealing to modern tastes. The exact date when the story is set is never given; generally, the movie's taken to be set in 1813, when the book was published. I'm not going to go into the full story of
Read more

Pattern Time: 1860s Chemise

-
Image
For my 150th post ( \o/ ), a quick little pattern someone might find useful. When I was working my way through a box a few weeks ago, I came across a chemise that didn't quite want to lay flat.  I took a closer look at it to figure out why, and noticed that it had a unique construction with the sleeves cut in one with the body and gussets inserted in the neckline.  I did a really quick sketch of the cutting layout and measured the important bits, so that when I got home I could draw it up in proportion on graph paper. (nb. I messed up. I've been noticing it for a while, but didn't want to point it out from shame, but I accidentally gave the neckline length as it is when gathered - the horizontal cut should be much longer, to within about four inches of the side seam. Please correct for this when making your own version.)
Read more

A Difficult History: Corsetry and Feminism, Part One

-
Image
Recently, I began following a couple of Tumblr blogs focusing on waist training and daily corset wear. Daily wear is not for me, waist training even less so, but I find it an interesting practice. It is also a controversial one. For example, a recent Huffington Post article, " Corset Queen Penny Brown Loves Getting 'Waisted' ," drew comments which were nearly all extremely negative, as do most articles that bring the practice to mainstream attention. Usually, the mental states of the women who waist-train are called into question, and there are numerous references to feminism as incompatible with corsets. The general idea is that the first wave feminists of the late 19th and early 20th century would be horrified by women today wearing them, and that their assumed reaction is an objective statement on the practice. My feeling is that the subject is complex, and cannot be simply declared feminist or unfeminist. There are far more factors than the average internet comm
Read more