Galerie des Modes, 37e Cahier, 1ere Figure

-
Full Court mourning, adjusted, with tied Coiffure.  According to etiquette the gown is of Raz de S. Maur, trimmed with Gauze in drapery tied with ribbons on a ground of bouillonné crêpe. (1781)

This plate is from the Museum of Fine Arts Boston, 44.1519.

According to Louis Harmouth's Dictionary of Textiles (1920):

Comments

  1. LouisApril 25, 2013 at 8:47 AM

    Hi Cassidy!
    I'm trying to learn more about 18th century fashion and your blog seems to be a great help and inspiration with it. Thank you so much for doing these translations! Do you mind if I link your blog to my next post? I'd like to use couple of pictures you have here as examples.

    I just tought I should ask you first.

    Louis

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyApril 25, 2013 at 9:39 AM

      Hi, Louis! Thank you so much. I don't mind at all if you link to me, and if you want to use these images, go ahead - the one thing I'd ask is that you upload them to your own blog rather than hotlinking, and that you link back to the MFA where possible.

      Delete
  2. LouisApril 25, 2013 at 10:44 AM

    Okay, thank you for answering!

    ReplyDelete
  3. ZipZipApril 25, 2013 at 1:17 PM

    Fascinating. The matte effect is very nice. The bouillionee crepe on the skirt robings -- or are there parements? -- is really neat; I love how the gauze puffs play off them. Wonder how one would do those? If it were me, I'd cut long strips of crepe, turn the long sides under, starch them well, and sew down little puffs in a random pattern all down the skirt robings. Oh dear, I am certain I have the terminology wrong for the vertical decoration down the edges of the robe.

    This is one of the more effectively trimmed court dresses in the series so far.

    Very best,

    Natalie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyApril 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM

      I would call them parements, since they're such wide bands and look to be just trim applied on top. Your method sounds about right to me! Or maybe it's meant to be ruched in a grid?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pride and Prejudice 1995: The Little Things

-
Image
I did threaten to write about the Ehle/Firth Pride and Prejudice , and since I'm in a writing mood without a topic I decided to make good. Regency adaptations tend to go for an overall accurate look, interpreting age and income within the confines of realistic silhouettes and colors, and so they avoid the scrutiny and reputation that a more obviously artistic and unrealistic production garners. But just as this version of P&P  is not entirely faithful in every respect (e.g. the added Darcy-perspective scenes, the actors nearly all being significantly older than their characters - perhaps the most egregious example being Julia Sawalha in her late twenties playing teenage Lydia), Dinah Hill's costuming is not entirely accurate - mainly in ways that make the period more appealing to modern tastes. The exact date when the story is set is never given; generally, the movie's taken to be set in 1813, when the book was published. I'm not going to go into the full story of
Read more

Pattern Time: 1860s Chemise

-
Image
For my 150th post ( \o/ ), a quick little pattern someone might find useful. When I was working my way through a box a few weeks ago, I came across a chemise that didn't quite want to lay flat.  I took a closer look at it to figure out why, and noticed that it had a unique construction with the sleeves cut in one with the body and gussets inserted in the neckline.  I did a really quick sketch of the cutting layout and measured the important bits, so that when I got home I could draw it up in proportion on graph paper. (nb. I messed up. I've been noticing it for a while, but didn't want to point it out from shame, but I accidentally gave the neckline length as it is when gathered - the horizontal cut should be much longer, to within about four inches of the side seam. Please correct for this when making your own version.)
Read more

A Difficult History: Corsetry and Feminism, Part One

-
Image
Recently, I began following a couple of Tumblr blogs focusing on waist training and daily corset wear. Daily wear is not for me, waist training even less so, but I find it an interesting practice. It is also a controversial one. For example, a recent Huffington Post article, " Corset Queen Penny Brown Loves Getting 'Waisted' ," drew comments which were nearly all extremely negative, as do most articles that bring the practice to mainstream attention. Usually, the mental states of the women who waist-train are called into question, and there are numerous references to feminism as incompatible with corsets. The general idea is that the first wave feminists of the late 19th and early 20th century would be horrified by women today wearing them, and that their assumed reaction is an objective statement on the practice. My feeling is that the subject is complex, and cannot be simply declared feminist or unfeminist. There are far more factors than the average internet comm
Read more