Galerie des Modes, 36e Cahier, 1ere Figure

-
Louis XVI, King of France and Navarre, wearing his royal dress, leaning on his Sceptre. (1781)

This plate is from the Museum of Fine Arts Boston, 44.1511.  According to the writing at the top of the plate, and to the reprinted Galerie des Modes, this is the first cahier of the third volume, which seems to conflict with the bound second volume at Bunka Gakuen; I don't really know which to go with.  The fact that these are plates of royalty does imply that they're at the beginning of a volume, so there's that.

Comments

  1. heileenApril 17, 2013 at 7:54 PM

    What is really interesting is that image is a faked image of Louis XVI, but who initiated it ? He is wearing the costume of L'Ordre du Saint Esprit, the most important chivalry order in french mornarchy. This a very old fashion costume (look at his "breeches") because it was fixed very early during the reign of Louis XIV and was supposed to recall old time. The most important part of the costume itself is the coat wich is not only expensive (embroidered of gold) but also incredibly heavy and hard to manipulate Men would always fall wearing it. The king, being the highest ranked of the order was considered the only one able to manage the cloak with ease, and it as more or less an untold metapor on the weight of power. In fact the kind was just training hours to be able to walk in it. The problem is that Louis XVI barely trained with it and on coronation day, wearng it, he tripped over it. Instead of assuming it (he was such a young king, it would have pass), he took a drastic measure, an CUT the cloack to a capelet barely falling down to above the hip ! Which means that this cloak, in 1781, is probably impossible, and yet very interesting :) For some reason, someone either in the magazine, or from the royal comunication staff thought it would embodied the monarchy better

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyApril 18, 2013 at 3:52 PM

      I was thinking it was based on the famous portrait by Callet, but they're not quite the same. Maybe they went off that painting but thought a jauntier pose would be better?

      Oh, Louis.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pride and Prejudice 1995: The Little Things

-
Image
I did threaten to write about the Ehle/Firth Pride and Prejudice , and since I'm in a writing mood without a topic I decided to make good. Regency adaptations tend to go for an overall accurate look, interpreting age and income within the confines of realistic silhouettes and colors, and so they avoid the scrutiny and reputation that a more obviously artistic and unrealistic production garners. But just as this version of P&P  is not entirely faithful in every respect (e.g. the added Darcy-perspective scenes, the actors nearly all being significantly older than their characters - perhaps the most egregious example being Julia Sawalha in her late twenties playing teenage Lydia), Dinah Hill's costuming is not entirely accurate - mainly in ways that make the period more appealing to modern tastes. The exact date when the story is set is never given; generally, the movie's taken to be set in 1813, when the book was published. I'm not going to go into the full story of
Read more

Pattern Time: 1860s Chemise

-
Image
For my 150th post ( \o/ ), a quick little pattern someone might find useful. When I was working my way through a box a few weeks ago, I came across a chemise that didn't quite want to lay flat.  I took a closer look at it to figure out why, and noticed that it had a unique construction with the sleeves cut in one with the body and gussets inserted in the neckline.  I did a really quick sketch of the cutting layout and measured the important bits, so that when I got home I could draw it up in proportion on graph paper. (nb. I messed up. I've been noticing it for a while, but didn't want to point it out from shame, but I accidentally gave the neckline length as it is when gathered - the horizontal cut should be much longer, to within about four inches of the side seam. Please correct for this when making your own version.)
Read more

A Difficult History: Corsetry and Feminism, Part One

-
Image
Recently, I began following a couple of Tumblr blogs focusing on waist training and daily corset wear. Daily wear is not for me, waist training even less so, but I find it an interesting practice. It is also a controversial one. For example, a recent Huffington Post article, " Corset Queen Penny Brown Loves Getting 'Waisted' ," drew comments which were nearly all extremely negative, as do most articles that bring the practice to mainstream attention. Usually, the mental states of the women who waist-train are called into question, and there are numerous references to feminism as incompatible with corsets. The general idea is that the first wave feminists of the late 19th and early 20th century would be horrified by women today wearing them, and that their assumed reaction is an objective statement on the practice. My feeling is that the subject is complex, and cannot be simply declared feminist or unfeminist. There are far more factors than the average internet comm
Read more