Tea in Kinderhook

-
On Saturday, I went to the Formally Invited tea at the Vanderpoel House in Kinderhook, put on by the Columbia County Historical Society and Clermont State Historic Site.  It was wonderful!  The whole first floor was cleared, with one room for the tea, punch, and food, one room for coats (and a full-length mirror, so you can make sure your outfit is all right), and the doors between the parlors opened to create one long space for dancing.



The food was fantastic - butter cookies, seed cakes, a pound cake with currants, salmagundi, syllabub (first time I ever had syllabub), strawberry ices, and these little chicken tart things - and there was a whole selection of teas, including the custom Vanderpoel and Clermont blends, which were the two I tried.


My favorite part of the afternoon, apart from getting to talk to so many other enthusiasts, was learning to dance.  Sadly, I can't remember the names of the two dances I learned, but I did learn two!  I could probably even do them again.  I definitely recognized them from P&P95, which was very cool.  I DO ELIZABETH BENNET DANCES.  After that I went to cool down with some champagne punch (movies don't always give the impression that country dancing was a very energetic pastime, but it so is), and spent the rest of the time talking about sewing and museums and the Lizzie Bennet Diaries.



 My face is good in this one so it gets to be bigger.
Me with Kjirsten from Clermont

As you can see, I wore the transitional gown I made for my qualifying paper, pinned up for dancing and walking around a crowded room.  I also had on a red wool spencer I made for the Empire State Costumers' meal at the Tailored Tea in Latham.  I'm not super happy with it; I draped the pattern on my Uniquely You form while looking at the riding habit in Patterns of Fashion I and it fit the dress form very well, but my bust in the light transitional corset is very different from my dress form's bust and I had a hard time with the darts.  The back and the peplum are cuter.  I made my bonnet for a planned ca. 1840 outfit, so it doesn't technically fit this one, but I don't think it looks glaringly wrong.

I would really love to go to another event like this one, but I want a proper Regency ensemble.  The other night I worked out a pattern to make this adorable corset (mostly by machine, I think, because I'm just not very good at corsetry and don't want to hand-sew all of it and then have it drastically not fit), and then I would like to make this gown:

Evening dress, 1938.3.1, Albany Institute of History & Art: 200 Years of Collecting, Tammis Groft and Mary Alice McKay, 1998, p. 279
Because of its inclusion in the catalogue, it was decided that this wouldn't be in the Great, Strange, and Rarely Seen exhibition, but I took the pattern anyway (before the dress-theme was changed to the 1920s at the last minute, I was hoping to put patterns of all the gowns on the museum's website).  It belonged to Ann Eliza Ten Eyck (1804-1866), a member of a long-standing Albany family, who was said to have worn it to a ball given in Lafayette's honor at Clermont (FULL CIRCLE) in 1824.

Comments

  1. SusanMarch 19, 2013 at 9:29 PM

    Oooh! Full Circle! Love those kind of things. Please do make that golden dress. It will look very pretty--especially if you put all those poufy leaves on it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyMarch 20, 2013 at 9:49 AM

      It wasn't even on purpose! I brought down my catalogue to see what exactly the story was and seeing the Clermont connection was a surprise.

      Delete
  2. AnonymousMarch 20, 2013 at 7:23 AM

    What fun! You look lovely! I've wrestled with that Arnold spencer and lost; the collar and I are not friends so it sits in dejected muslin waiting for summer. I think you're smart to use the machine for corsetry; hand-sewing stays that don't fit is really discouraging. And what's better than full circle? Neat!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyMarch 20, 2013 at 10:22 AM

      Thank you! I probably would have done better to stick closer to the pattern, to be honest, but it does look incredibly tricky.

      The last pair of stays I finished were entirely by hand, but then I started a second, slightly later pair of stays also by hand, but they have so many problems and I am just bad at corset fitting. So for now I'm cutting down on the hand-sewn stays and saving that for things I stand a better chance of being able to use.

      Delete
  3. AmandaMarch 20, 2013 at 9:30 AM

    Sounds like a great time! And good food! (Is syllabub not OMG THE BEST THING EVER??)

    That's a good picture of you on the stairs - perfect photo op!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyMarch 20, 2013 at 4:03 PM

      I had very little idea of what syllabub was going to be like, so it was such a nice surprise! Maybe a bit too lemony, though ...

      Thanks! I actually broke the ice with a group of people by offering to take their picture there.

      Delete
  4. ZipZipMarch 20, 2013 at 3:19 PM

    Ooh! How was the syllabub! Glad you learned dances: aren't they so much fun?

    Very best,

    Natalie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyMarch 20, 2013 at 4:06 PM

      It was lovely and frothy. I should have had a second helping! The dances were so much fun, I can't wait until there's another event where I can practice them some more.

      Delete
  5. Tea in the LibraryMarch 23, 2013 at 8:34 AM

    Sounds wonderful! Love the pictures. I feel like I could set in to them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyMarch 23, 2013 at 10:36 AM

      I found even more on Facebook - the Columbia County Historical Society uploaded a ton as well.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pride and Prejudice 1995: The Little Things

-
Image
I did threaten to write about the Ehle/Firth Pride and Prejudice , and since I'm in a writing mood without a topic I decided to make good. Regency adaptations tend to go for an overall accurate look, interpreting age and income within the confines of realistic silhouettes and colors, and so they avoid the scrutiny and reputation that a more obviously artistic and unrealistic production garners. But just as this version of P&P  is not entirely faithful in every respect (e.g. the added Darcy-perspective scenes, the actors nearly all being significantly older than their characters - perhaps the most egregious example being Julia Sawalha in her late twenties playing teenage Lydia), Dinah Hill's costuming is not entirely accurate - mainly in ways that make the period more appealing to modern tastes. The exact date when the story is set is never given; generally, the movie's taken to be set in 1813, when the book was published. I'm not going to go into the full story of
Read more

Pattern Time: 1860s Chemise

-
Image
For my 150th post ( \o/ ), a quick little pattern someone might find useful. When I was working my way through a box a few weeks ago, I came across a chemise that didn't quite want to lay flat.  I took a closer look at it to figure out why, and noticed that it had a unique construction with the sleeves cut in one with the body and gussets inserted in the neckline.  I did a really quick sketch of the cutting layout and measured the important bits, so that when I got home I could draw it up in proportion on graph paper. (nb. I messed up. I've been noticing it for a while, but didn't want to point it out from shame, but I accidentally gave the neckline length as it is when gathered - the horizontal cut should be much longer, to within about four inches of the side seam. Please correct for this when making your own version.)
Read more

A Difficult History: Corsetry and Feminism, Part One

-
Image
Recently, I began following a couple of Tumblr blogs focusing on waist training and daily corset wear. Daily wear is not for me, waist training even less so, but I find it an interesting practice. It is also a controversial one. For example, a recent Huffington Post article, " Corset Queen Penny Brown Loves Getting 'Waisted' ," drew comments which were nearly all extremely negative, as do most articles that bring the practice to mainstream attention. Usually, the mental states of the women who waist-train are called into question, and there are numerous references to feminism as incompatible with corsets. The general idea is that the first wave feminists of the late 19th and early 20th century would be horrified by women today wearing them, and that their assumed reaction is an objective statement on the practice. My feeling is that the subject is complex, and cannot be simply declared feminist or unfeminist. There are far more factors than the average internet comm
Read more