Photos and Considerations

-

Lately I've been thinking about what I want to do re: costuming.  Several weeks ago, when I went to the Saratoga Battlefield for the Artificer's Weekend, I decided that I really was going to start going to events.  The next weekend was Defiance and Independence at Fort Ticonderoga, and I was all set to go ... but then I found out that there was an Iron Man competition thing going on that would make horrible traffic, and I thought about driving in my stays, and how the only member of the 62nd I knew wasn't going to be there, and the last few weekends had been really busy, so I didn't go.  So I've spent the last few weekends chilling, because I push myself at work and can't handle being "on" on the weekend as well.

Me at Saratoga, after having shaped my hat - much better!



I tend to think that if I really wanted to do reenacting, I would be doing it.  I have two groups to choose from locally, and I could go to events without one if I wanted (if not knowing anyone/being on my own weren't part of the problem), but in general I'm not sure if it's for me.  There are issues with my kit that need fixing, and in general I feel like reenacting lends itself to a constant improvement, which is rewarding - but because fashion history research is part of my career, I don't want to box myself in and concentrate too much on one era.

The non-reenactor-costumer side of things seems to be more my cup of tea - not that I don't love trying to be as accurate and stitch-county as possible, but you get a wider range of eras and can focus on making an outfit you like rather than representing a class or occupation in specific.  The trouble here is that I don't live near any places where costumers tend to congregate!  There is a Victorian street-walk around Christmas time in Saratoga and I'd love to make a late 1830s outfit for it.*  But for the most part, there aren't non-Revolutionary War events, and I don't have any local friends interested in creating our own.

 I have no other relevant pictures, sorry.

Working at the Chapman has fired me up about sewing for research, but right now I'm rapidly approaching the end of my internship and don't yet have a new job lined up - at the same time, I owe $200 on my student loans each month and $100 to my father for my horrible car.  I have a bit of a stash built up - a bundle of cotton for that Victorian street-walk outfit - but not all of the fabric I'd need to make anything, and I really do try to limit my spending.

I don't have anything profound to wrap this post up with.  It's really just thinking out loud.  I had thought that reenacting would give me what I want, but the more I think about it, the more I'm not sure.

* Speaking of which, I don't suppose anyone knows of a good source for a solid cotton twill or sateen?  Sateen would be best because it's what I see a lot of in historical corsets and dress linings, but nowadays it seems like it only comes in a really light weight for sheeting that's not what I want at all.

Comments

  1. AnnaAugust 10, 2012 at 1:25 AM

    I don't have very many events to go to around here, but I will admit that I get a little burnt out, everything feels same-old-same-old from event to event, and I wonder why I put so much work into getting ready, packing up, and dressing up. Especially because the actual process of sewing a new piece is way more fun than wearing it, to me! If the creative process is what is fun for you, have you thought about finding small local house-museums who might be interested in having replica clothing on display? I'm thinking about getting involved in this aspect because it seems a shame to do that much work on a gown or garment for it to only come out when I wear it once or twice a year. Plus like you I'd love to try non-18thc clothing and a lot of the house-museums in my area are mid-19thc to early 20th. Might be a fun project!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyAugust 10, 2012 at 9:00 PM

      That's an excellent idea! I could definitely see doing that, maybe at half or quarter scale to save on materials. Maybe I'll bring it up at my internship sometime next week. Which is actually my last full week, which means that I will be having some free time while I look for another internship/job.

      You've also reminded me that I got a 1912 project skirt pattern back in June, and I've got that cut out to scale now. :D So there's some useful sewing that doesn't require any personal fitting at all!

      Delete
  2. Sanna KAugust 10, 2012 at 1:38 AM

    Aw, I really know how you feel! I'm also on a very very limited budget and live far away from other reenactors. I know there's one medieval group in my town but it's actually a group of friends and they do everything together - as a group of friends. Like, they don't advertise their events on the web or anything, so it's kind of hard to get in... and I'm not that interested in medieval clothing anyway. So, I usually have to travel to the capital to get to reenact 18th century once a year and I can't afford to travel more than that. *sigh*

    It's really depressing sometimes, when you read on fb about others having dancing lessons or tavern parties and I'm here all alone with my sewing... I've even tried to arrange events, but it didn't turn out to be that fun. Why? Because the others weren't even half as interested in the 18th century as I was and they didn't know how to sew or anything so they asked if I could borrow my costumes or make them costumes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CassidyAugust 10, 2012 at 9:16 PM

      It sounds like it would probably be a bit awkward with that group, too, if they're that close. Not to advise against it! But I would never be able to get up the courage to try to a group like that. Or to try to arrange my own events!

      I do get a bit of a vicarious thrill from looking at other people's event photos, but it's tough. I think there are more events around where I live, I just don't find out about them until it's too soon to make anything. Which is a pretty good argument for making stuff from all different eras for no specific reason, really!

      Delete
  3. CassidyAugust 11, 2012 at 2:03 PM

    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  4. RowennaSeptember 1, 2012 at 11:54 AM

    So late on this--sorry! But wanted to say--reenacting might not be the be-all and end-all to fill the costuming-for-fun part of life, but it does help you meet others with goofy history penchants. I do a lot of Rev War reenacting, but in the off-season we often plan non-Rev-War "invite only" friends events--Christmas parties, skating parties, teas. The more people you know and the more time you spend together, this kind of stuff just seems to come together! It does take time to build those relationships (and it takes finding the right group...), but I've found them to be really, really rewarding.

    I love the idea of offering to make repro clothing for small museums--after working at one, I know they can often really use the help!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pride and Prejudice 1995: The Little Things

-
Image
I did threaten to write about the Ehle/Firth Pride and Prejudice , and since I'm in a writing mood without a topic I decided to make good. Regency adaptations tend to go for an overall accurate look, interpreting age and income within the confines of realistic silhouettes and colors, and so they avoid the scrutiny and reputation that a more obviously artistic and unrealistic production garners. But just as this version of P&P  is not entirely faithful in every respect (e.g. the added Darcy-perspective scenes, the actors nearly all being significantly older than their characters - perhaps the most egregious example being Julia Sawalha in her late twenties playing teenage Lydia), Dinah Hill's costuming is not entirely accurate - mainly in ways that make the period more appealing to modern tastes. The exact date when the story is set is never given; generally, the movie's taken to be set in 1813, when the book was published. I'm not going to go into the full story of
Read more

Pattern Time: 1860s Chemise

-
Image
For my 150th post ( \o/ ), a quick little pattern someone might find useful. When I was working my way through a box a few weeks ago, I came across a chemise that didn't quite want to lay flat.  I took a closer look at it to figure out why, and noticed that it had a unique construction with the sleeves cut in one with the body and gussets inserted in the neckline.  I did a really quick sketch of the cutting layout and measured the important bits, so that when I got home I could draw it up in proportion on graph paper. (nb. I messed up. I've been noticing it for a while, but didn't want to point it out from shame, but I accidentally gave the neckline length as it is when gathered - the horizontal cut should be much longer, to within about four inches of the side seam. Please correct for this when making your own version.)
Read more

A Difficult History: Corsetry and Feminism, Part One

-
Image
Recently, I began following a couple of Tumblr blogs focusing on waist training and daily corset wear. Daily wear is not for me, waist training even less so, but I find it an interesting practice. It is also a controversial one. For example, a recent Huffington Post article, " Corset Queen Penny Brown Loves Getting 'Waisted' ," drew comments which were nearly all extremely negative, as do most articles that bring the practice to mainstream attention. Usually, the mental states of the women who waist-train are called into question, and there are numerous references to feminism as incompatible with corsets. The general idea is that the first wave feminists of the late 19th and early 20th century would be horrified by women today wearing them, and that their assumed reaction is an objective statement on the practice. My feeling is that the subject is complex, and cannot be simply declared feminist or unfeminist. There are far more factors than the average internet comm
Read more